On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 09:39:37AM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Wed, 2 Mar 2022 18:18:10 +0530, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote in
>> I don't think that's useful. Being in LogCheckpointStart
>> (CreateCheckPoint or CreateRestartPoint) itself means that somebody
>> has requested a checkpoint. Having CHECKPOINT_REQUESTED doesn't add
>> any value.
>
> Agreed.
Exactly my impression. This would apply now to the WAL shutdown code
paths, and I'd suspect that the callers of CreateCheckPoint() are not
going to increase soon. The point is: the logs already provide some
contexts for any of those callers so I see no need for this additional
information.
> Actually no one does but RequestCheckpoint() accepts 0 as flags.
> Checkpointer would be a bit more complex without CHECKPOINT_REQUESTED.
> I don't think it does us any good to get rid of the flag value.
I'd rather keep this code as-is.
--
Michael
