Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRD0hH1E_dDyM=yYmbwCGdCiLydsda1vjn0MdwN7mOZACA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers

Hi


I think you'd basically have to come up with a generic design for partitioning
catalog tables into local / non-local storage, without needing explicit code
for each catalog. That could also be used to store the default catalog
contents separately from user defined ones (e.g. pg_proc is pretty large).

There is still a risk of bloating in local storage, but, mainly, you probably have to modify a lot of lines because the system cache doesn't support partitioning.

Regards

Pavel
 

Greetings,

Andres Freund

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Add CHECKPOINT_REQUESTED flag to the log message in LogCheckpointStart()
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: shared-memory based stats collector