On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 05:00:43PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 4:56 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> That's the same thing as what I sent upthread, so that's correct to
>> me, except that I have fixed both functions :)
>
> Sorry, I hadn't looked at your patch.
That's fine. This is something you have committed, after all.
>> You are not touching pg_stat_get_subscription_worker() because the
>> plan is to revert it from HEAD? I have not followed the other
>> discussion closely.
>>
>
> It is still under discussion. I'll take the necessary action along
> with other things related to that view based on the conclusion on that
> thread.
Sounds good to me. The patch you are proposing upthread is OK for
me.
--
Michael
