On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 4:56 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 04:19:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:21 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Agreed.
> >>
> >
> > +1. How about attached?
>
> That's the same thing as what I sent upthread, so that's correct to
> me, except that I have fixed both functions :)
>
Sorry, I hadn't looked at your patch.
> You are not touching pg_stat_get_subscription_worker() because the
> plan is to revert it from HEAD? I have not followed the other
> discussion closely.
>
It is still under discussion. I'll take the necessary action along
with other things related to that view based on the conclusion on that
thread.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
