Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction
Date
Msg-id Y1dyDMIs+wnv94DR@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Getting rid of SQLValueFunction  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 02:27:07PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have looked at that, and the attribute mapping remains compatible
> with past versions once the appropriate pg_proc entries are added.
> The updated patch set attached does that (with a user() function as
> well to keep the code a maximum simple), with more tests to cover the
> attribute case mentioned upthread.

Attached is a rebased patch set, as of the conflicts from 2e0d80c.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: GUC values - recommended way to declare the C variables?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Some regression tests for the pg_control_*() functions