Re: Decreasing WAL size effects - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: Decreasing WAL size effects
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0810302114190.18447@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Decreasing WAL size effects  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Decreasing WAL size effects  (Jason Long <mailing.list@supernovasoftware.com>)
Re: Decreasing WAL size effects  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Tom Lane wrote:

> The real reason not to put that functionality into core (or even
> contrib) is that it's a stopgap kluge.  What the people who want this
> functionality *really* want is continuous (streaming) log-shipping, not
> WAL-segment-at-a-time shipping.

Sure, and that's why I didn't care when this got kicked out of the March
CommitFest; was hoping a better one would show up.  But if 8.4 isn't going
out the door with the feature people really want, it would be nice to at
least make the stopgap kludge more easily available.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Are there plans to add data compression feature to postgresql?