On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, David Gould wrote:
> Excuse? I think glibc is intended to be standard everywhere. As far as I
> know, it has nothing to do with Linux other than Linux (as usual) is
> faster to adopt it than some of the "legacy systems".
'standard' in what sense?
In the sense that Linux uses it you are correct.
I don't expect NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, BSDI, Solaris, Digital Unix, AIX,
HPUX, SCO/Unixware etc to use it.
In that sense Linux is still doing things its own way, breaking things for
no aparent reason.
/*
Matthew N. Dodd | A memory retaining a love you had for life
winter@jurai.net | As cruel as it seems nothing ever seems to
http://www.jurai.net/~winter | go right - FLA M 3.1:53
*/
