RE: refactoring basebackup.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)
Subject RE: refactoring basebackup.c
Date
Msg-id PH7PR84MB188512B88392DD495D8F1E3EEE319@PH7PR84MB1885.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi, Hackers.
Thank you for developing a great feature.
The current help message shown below does not seem to be able to specify the 'client-' or 'server-' for lz4
compression.
 --compress = {[{client, server}-]gzip, lz4, none}[:LEVEL]

The attached small patch fixes the help message as follows:
 --compress = {[{client, server}-]{gzip, lz4}, none}[:LEVEL]

Regards,
Noriyoshi Shinoda
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> 
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2022 12:50 AM
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Jeevan Ladhe <jeevanladhe.os@gmail.com>; Dipesh Pandit <dipesh.pandit@gmail.com>; Abhijit Menon-Sen
<ams@toroid.org>;Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>; Jeevan Ladhe <jeevan.ladhe@enterprisedb.com>; Mark Dilger
<mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>;pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
 
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:29 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> FYI: there's a couple typos in the last 2 patches.

Hmm. OK. But I don't consider "can be optionally specified" incorrect or worse than "can optionally be specified".

I do agree that spelling words correctly is a good idea.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com 



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing more vacuumlazy.c special cases, relfrozenxid optimizations
Next
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc