Re: refactoring basebackup.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobo_ZQpRw3rDKM0H6iOBEv4ccA=-7bGo4OSXeHGiWQm4g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: refactoring basebackup.c  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses RE: refactoring basebackup.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 10:29 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
> FYI: there's a couple typos in the last 2 patches.

Hmm. OK. But I don't consider "can be optionally specified" incorrect
or worse than "can optionally be specified".

I do agree that spelling words correctly is a good idea.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_receivewal.exe unhandled exception in zlib1.dll