>> It's possible the parameter name also appears in documentation for
>> out-of-tree PLs, as each PL's validator function determines what
>> "check_function_bodies" really means in that setting.
>That parameter is also set explicitly in pg_dump output, so we
>can't rename it without breaking existing dump files.
>Admittedly, guc.c does have provisions for substituting new names
>if we rename some parameter. But I'm not in a hurry to create
>more instances of that behavior; the potential for confusion
>seems to outweigh any benefit.
>+1 for updating the description though. We could s/function/routine/
>where space is tight.
Thanks for your inputs. Attached a proposal which updates the description.
Regards
Daniel
