Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures
Date
Msg-id 2339762.1618070966@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: check_function_bodies: At least the description seems wrong, since we have prodedures  ("Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com> writes:
>> +1 for updating the description though.  We could s/function/routine/
>> where space is tight.

> Thanks for your inputs. Attached a proposal which updates the description.

I changed config.sgml's description similarly, and pushed this.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL-standard function body
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: truncating timestamps on arbitrary intervals