Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log entries? - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Ron Snyder
Subject Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log entries?
Date
Msg-id F888C30C3021D411B9DA00B0D0209BE803BB9961@cvo-exchange.cvo.roguewave.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log  (Dave Cramer <Dave@micro-automation.net>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Given the following log entries:

May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [353] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: begin;
May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [354] DEBUG:  query: SELECT COMPRESSED,
DATA FROM ATTACHMENTS WHERE ID=460739 AND ATYPE='X'
May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [355] DEBUG:  query: end
May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [356] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: end
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [357] DEBUG:  query: begin;
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [358] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: begin;
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [359] DEBUG:  query: SELECT COMPRESSED,
DATA FROM ATTACHMENTS WHERE ID=460739 AND ATYPE='X'
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [360] DEBUG:  query: end
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [361] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: end
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [362] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
descriptor (0)
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [363] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
descriptor (0)
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [364] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
descriptor (0)
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [365] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
descriptor (0)
May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [366] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
descriptor (0)

I'm trying to help some programmers figure out what portion of their java
code might be causing this, but I don't know java to help them debug their
code-- I was wondering if there is anything on the server end that I could
change to help them track this down.  They're using the jdbc that was
current shortly after the 7.2 release and the 7.2 server (they're still in
acceptance testing for 7.2.1).

They do turn autocommit off, and they've discovered that they may not have
been turning it back on explicitly so are going to make a change to that
portion of code.  Are there any other easy mistakes that people have made
that may result in the above behavior?

-ron

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: basis volume limited
Date:
Subject: Fwd: help with jdbc driver building -postgresql sources
Next
From: "Paul Meigniez"
Date:
Subject: NullPointerException in rg.postgresql.jdbc2.ResultSet.getBytes