Re: Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log
Date
Msg-id 1020882988.1596.8.camel@inspiron.cramers
Whole thread Raw
In response to Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log entries?  (Ron Snyder <snyder@roguewave.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Ron,

Can you send the relevant java code as well

Dave
On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 22:08, Ron Snyder wrote:
> Given the following log entries:
>
> May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [353] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: begin;
> May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [354] DEBUG:  query: SELECT COMPRESSED,
> DATA FROM ATTACHMENTS WHERE ID=460739 AND ATYPE='X'
> May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [355] DEBUG:  query: end
> May  7 09:40:05 vault pgqv[13698]: [356] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: end
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [357] DEBUG:  query: begin;
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [358] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: begin;
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [359] DEBUG:  query: SELECT COMPRESSED,
> DATA FROM ATTACHMENTS WHERE ID=460739 AND ATYPE='X'
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [360] DEBUG:  query: end
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [361] DEBUG:  ProcessUtility: end
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [362] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
> descriptor (0)
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [363] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
> descriptor (0)
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [364] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
> descriptor (0)
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [365] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
> descriptor (0)
> May  7 09:40:08 vault pgqv[13698]: [366] ERROR:  lo_close: invalid large obj
> descriptor (0)
>
> I'm trying to help some programmers figure out what portion of their java
> code might be causing this, but I don't know java to help them debug their
> code-- I was wondering if there is anything on the server end that I could
> change to help them track this down.  They're using the jdbc that was
> current shortly after the 7.2 release and the 7.2 server (they're still in
> acceptance testing for 7.2.1).
>
> They do turn autocommit off, and they've discovered that they may not have
> been turning it back on explicitly so are going to make a change to that
> portion of code.  Are there any other easy mistakes that people have made
> that may result in the above behavior?
>
> -ron
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
>




pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: help with jdbc driver building -postgresql sources
Next
From: Ron Snyder
Date:
Subject: Re: Logging function calls to figure out lo_close log entr