On Nov 7, 2009, at 11:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> EXCLUDE probably flows most nicely with the optional USING clause or
>> without. My only complaint was that it's a transitive verb, so it
>> seems
>> to impart more meaning than it actually can. I doubt anyone would
>> actually be more confused in practice, though. If a couple of people
>> agree, I'll change it to EXCLUDE.
>
> EXCLUDE sounds good to me.
+1
David
