Re: operator exclusion constraints - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: operator exclusion constraints
Date
Msg-id 12134.1257620905@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: operator exclusion constraints  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: operator exclusion constraints
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> EXCLUDE probably flows most nicely with the optional USING clause or
> without. My only complaint was that it's a transitive verb, so it seems
> to impart more meaning than it actually can. I doubt anyone would
> actually be more confused in practice, though. If a couple of people
> agree, I'll change it to EXCLUDE.

EXCLUDE sounds good to me.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: operator exclusion constraints