Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdv--HNOQ3aC1YGHRMfKGf37tHs8aD1u6qgZUuEiqhAhUg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 1:10 PM Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 15:33, Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What I meant was outline-atomics support was added in GCC-9.4 and was made default in gcc-10.
> > LSE support is present for quite some time.
>
> FWIW, here is an earlier discussion on the same (also added the
> proposal author here) :
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/099F69EE-51D3-4214-934A-1F28C0A1A7A7%40amazon.com

Thank you for pointing! I wonder why the effect of LSE on Graviton2
observed by Tsahi Zidenberg is so modest.  It's probably because he
runs the tests with a low number of clients.

------
Regards,
Alexander Korotkov



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Next
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Re: Corruption during WAL replay