Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Khandekar
Subject Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
Date
Msg-id CAJ3gD9dTQdKNSWBAi8xEg3UC5_zbhdzR5iP=P7zm97i-R-V7Hw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.  (Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improving spin-lock implementation on ARM.
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 15:33, Krunal Bauskar <krunalbauskar@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I meant was outline-atomics support was added in GCC-9.4 and was made default in gcc-10.
> LSE support is present for quite some time.

FWIW, here is an earlier discussion on the same (also added the
proposal author here) :

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/099F69EE-51D3-4214-934A-1F28C0A1A7A7%40amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Anastasia Lubennikova
Date:
Subject: Commitfest 2020-11 is closed
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions