On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-04 at 17:45 +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> > wrote: > I am taking a look at this patch now. A few quick comments: > > * It looks like bounds_adjacent modifies it's by-reference > arguments, > which is a little worrying to me. The lower/upper labels are > flipped > back, but the inclusivities are not. Maybe just pass by value > instead? > > * Bounds_adjacent is sensitive to the argument order. Can't it > just take > bound1 and bound2? > > > Fixed. Patch is attached. >
It looks like this is basically the same diff as v0.1. Did something get mixed up?
