Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Korotkov
Subject Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date
Msg-id CAPpHfdu1JZDRffLpU1DoqVKJ6YUEjjS6cgt47B9K2pP1cHo7Rw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> originally this idea was proposed by Andres Freund while experimenting with
> lockfree Pin/UnpinBuffer [1].
> The patch is attached as well as results of pgbench -S on 72-cores machine.
> As before it shows huge benefit in this case.
> For sure, we should validate that it doesn't cause performance regression in
> other cases.  At least we should test read-write and smaller machines.
> Any other ideas?
>

may be test on Power m/c as well.

Good idea.  I don't have any such machine at hand now.  Do you have one?

------
Alexander Korotkov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Make better use of existing enums in plpgsql