Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1L4sYatnVmkwBomVMy_ff39OBh4QKwqa0inqLcH8_e8sg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?  (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov
>> <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> > Hackers,
>> >
>> > originally this idea was proposed by Andres Freund while experimenting
>> > with
>> > lockfree Pin/UnpinBuffer [1].
>> > The patch is attached as well as results of pgbench -S on 72-cores
>> > machine.
>> > As before it shows huge benefit in this case.
>> > For sure, we should validate that it doesn't cause performance
>> > regression in
>> > other cases.  At least we should test read-write and smaller machines.
>> > Any other ideas?
>> >
>>
>> may be test on Power m/c as well.
>
>
> Good idea.  I don't have any such machine at hand now.  Do you have one?
>

Yes, I can help in testing this patch during CF.  Feel free to ping,
if I missed or forgot to do same.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrea Adami
Date:
Subject: CREATE POLICY bug ?
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] [B-Tree] Keep indexes sorted by heap physical location