Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Alexander Korotkov |
---|---|
Subject | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAPpHfdtgcye9ELaLHw4ZOUxWQ9t1P=oBDJX8KwwOHqasESdXQQ@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes (Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>) |
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 7:51 AM Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > > On 29.11.2024 03:04, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 9:33 PM Alena Rybakina > > <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> On 28.11.2024 22:28, Ranier Vilela wrote: > >> > >> Em qui., 28 de nov. de 2024 às 16:03, Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> escreveu: > >>> Hi! Thank you for the case. > >>> > >>> On 28.11.2024 21:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: > >>>> Hello Alexander, > >>>> > >>>> 21.11.2024 09:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > >>>>> I'm going to push this if no objections. > >>>> Please look at the following query, which triggers an error after > >>>> ae4569161: > >>>> SET random_page_cost = 1; > >>>> CREATE TABLE tbl(u UUID); > >>>> CREATE INDEX idx ON tbl USING HASH (u); > >>>> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR > >>>> u = '11111111111111111111111111111111'; > >>>> > >>>> ERROR: XX000: ScalarArrayOpExpr index qual found where not allowed > >>>> LOCATION: ExecIndexBuildScanKeys, nodeIndexscan.c:1625 > >>>> > >>>> > >>> I found out what the problem is index scan method was not generated. We > >>> need to check this during OR clauses for SAOP transformation. > >>> > >>> There is a patch to fix this problem. > >> Hi. > >> Thanks for the quick fix. > >> > >> But I wonder if it is not possible to avoid all if the index is useless? > >> Maybe moving your fix to the beginning of the function? > >> > >> diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c > >> index d827fc9f4d..5ea0b27d01 100644 > >> --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c > >> +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c > >> @@ -3248,6 +3248,10 @@ match_orclause_to_indexcol(PlannerInfo *root, > >> Assert(IsA(orclause, BoolExpr)); > >> Assert(orclause->boolop == OR_EXPR); > >> > >> + /* Ignore index if it doesn't support index scans */ > >> + if(!index->amsearcharray) > >> + return NULL; > >> + > >> > >> Agree. I have updated the patch > >> > >> /* > >> * Try to convert a list of OR-clauses to a single SAOP expression. Each > >> * OR entry must be in the form: (indexkey operator constant) or (constant > >> > >> The test bug: > >> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR u = '11111111111111111111111111111111'; > >> QUERY PLAN > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Aggregate (cost=12.46..12.47 rows=1 width=8) > >> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on tbl (cost=2.14..12.41 rows=18 width=0) > >> Recheck Cond: ((u = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) OR (u = '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid)) > >> -> BitmapOr (cost=2.14..2.14 rows=18 width=0) > >> -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 width=0) > >> Index Cond: (u = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) > >> -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 width=0) > >> Index Cond: (u = '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid) > >> (8 rows) > > I slightly revised the fix and added similar check to > > group_similar_or_args(). Could you, please, review that before > > commit? > > > I agree with changes. Thank you! Andrei, Alena, thank you for the feedback. Pushed! ------ Regards, Alexander Korotkov Supabase
pgsql-hackers by date: