Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Alena Rybakina |
---|---|
Subject | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Date | |
Msg-id | 43db6a40-5c5f-4909-ad62-3060b297e686@postgrespro.ru Whole thread Raw |
In response to | POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
Responses |
Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On 29.11.2024 03:04, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 9:33 PM Alena Rybakina > <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> wrote: >> On 28.11.2024 22:28, Ranier Vilela wrote: >> >> Em qui., 28 de nov. de 2024 às 16:03, Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru> escreveu: >>> Hi! Thank you for the case. >>> >>> On 28.11.2024 21:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote: >>>> Hello Alexander, >>>> >>>> 21.11.2024 09:34, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >>>>> I'm going to push this if no objections. >>>> Please look at the following query, which triggers an error after >>>> ae4569161: >>>> SET random_page_cost = 1; >>>> CREATE TABLE tbl(u UUID); >>>> CREATE INDEX idx ON tbl USING HASH (u); >>>> SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR >>>> u = '11111111111111111111111111111111'; >>>> >>>> ERROR: XX000: ScalarArrayOpExpr index qual found where not allowed >>>> LOCATION: ExecIndexBuildScanKeys, nodeIndexscan.c:1625 >>>> >>>> >>> I found out what the problem is index scan method was not generated. We >>> need to check this during OR clauses for SAOP transformation. >>> >>> There is a patch to fix this problem. >> Hi. >> Thanks for the quick fix. >> >> But I wonder if it is not possible to avoid all if the index is useless? >> Maybe moving your fix to the beginning of the function? >> >> diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c >> index d827fc9f4d..5ea0b27d01 100644 >> --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c >> +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c >> @@ -3248,6 +3248,10 @@ match_orclause_to_indexcol(PlannerInfo *root, >> Assert(IsA(orclause, BoolExpr)); >> Assert(orclause->boolop == OR_EXPR); >> >> + /* Ignore index if it doesn't support index scans */ >> + if(!index->amsearcharray) >> + return NULL; >> + >> >> Agree. I have updated the patch >> >> /* >> * Try to convert a list of OR-clauses to a single SAOP expression. Each >> * OR entry must be in the form: (indexkey operator constant) or (constant >> >> The test bug: >> EXPLAIN SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tbl WHERE u = '00000000000000000000000000000000' OR u = '11111111111111111111111111111111'; >> QUERY PLAN >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Aggregate (cost=12.46..12.47 rows=1 width=8) >> -> Bitmap Heap Scan on tbl (cost=2.14..12.41 rows=18 width=0) >> Recheck Cond: ((u = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) OR (u = '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid)) >> -> BitmapOr (cost=2.14..2.14 rows=18 width=0) >> -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 width=0) >> Index Cond: (u = '00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000'::uuid) >> -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx (cost=0.00..1.07 rows=9 width=0) >> Index Cond: (u = '11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111'::uuid) >> (8 rows) > I slightly revised the fix and added similar check to > group_similar_or_args(). Could you, please, review that before > commit? > I agree with changes. Thank you! -- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional
pgsql-hackers by date: