Hi Michael-san,
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 9:10 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:40:36PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:28 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> > <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> At Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:20:07 +0900, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote in
> >>> Only two people complaining about the wording? Considering as well
>
> That's like.. Half the folks participating to this thread ;)
Right...
> >>> that we use that wording in the docs and there were no complains about
> >>> that IIRC, I don't feel a need to change that, TBH.
> >> But the most
> >> significant point in the previous mail is using "foreign tables using
> >> postgres_fdw" instead of "postgres_fdw foreign tables".
> >
> > OK, but as I said above, I don't feel the need to change that. How
> > about leaving it for another patch to improve the wording in that
> > message and/or the documentation if we really need to do it.
>
> Fine by me. If I were to put a number on that, I would be around +-0,
> so I don't have an actual objection with your point of view either.
OK, pushed as-is. Thanks for reviewing!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
