On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 06:40:36PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:28 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
> <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>> At Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:20:07 +0900, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote in
>>> Only two people complaining about the wording? Considering as well
That's like.. Half the folks participating to this thread ;)
>>> that we use that wording in the docs and there were no complains about
>>> that IIRC, I don't feel a need to change that, TBH.
>> But the most
>> significant point in the previous mail is using "foreign tables using
>> postgres_fdw" instead of "postgres_fdw foreign tables".
>
> OK, but as I said above, I don't feel the need to change that. How
> about leaving it for another patch to improve the wording in that
> message and/or the documentation if we really need to do it.
Fine by me. If I were to put a number on that, I would be around +-0,
so I don't have an actual objection with your point of view either.
--
Michael
