Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdw message.
Date
Msg-id CAPmGK1720grNvEhin_pG3CTM39a6HvR89cTXuAnT9s0rKHfQQA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdwmessage.  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH][DOC] Fix for PREPARE TRANSACTION doc and postgres_fdwmessage.  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
Horiguchi-san,

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 5:28 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Nov 2019 17:20:07 +0900, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com> wrote in
> > Only two people complaining about the wording?  Considering as well
> > that we use that wording in the docs and there were no complains about
> > that IIRC, I don't feel a need to change that, TBH.

> But the most
> significant point in the previous mail is using "foreign tables using
> postgres_fdw" instead of "postgres_fdw foreign tables".

OK, but as I said above, I don't feel the need to change that.  How
about leaving it for another patch to improve the wording in that
message and/or the documentation if we really need to do it.

> And the other
> point is using different message from temporary tables.

You mean we should do s/prepare/PREPARE/?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
Next
From: Sergei Fedorov
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch proposal] libpq portal support