Re: WIP: About CMake v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Christian Convey
Subject Re: WIP: About CMake v2
Date
Msg-id CAPfS4ZysWjDc64TN9ZUr6Sgp_EKh4mrAmp5tFfpm5_A80uLg3A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>)
Responses Re: WIP: About CMake v2  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Stefan,

>> I ask because I'm curious if/how someone in Yury's situation could
>> predict which minimum version of CMake must be supported in order for
>> his patch to be accepted.  (And if he accepts my offer to pitch in,
>> I'll actually need that particular detail.)
>
> well I personally think the level to meet would be that all the systems
> on the buildfarm that can build -HEAD at the time the patch is proposed
> for a commit should be able to build using the new system with whatever
> cmake version is available in those by default (if it is at all).

What standard would you suggest for those platforms which don't have
an obvious default version of CMake?

I assume this includes all versions of Windows and of OS X, but
perhaps I'm misinformed.

Thanks,
Christian



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: initdb: "'" for QUOTE_PATH (non-windows)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: synchronous_commit = remote_flush