On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:58 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> > I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is
> > a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
> > I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily
> > identify extensions that can be installed as "normal" user.
>
> Adding the trusted flag makes sense for visibility. There is a bit
> more that we could consider though? For example, what about
> "relocatable" and "requires"?
+1, and also the schema (for non relocatable extensions).