Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions
Date
Msg-id 20200924025826.GF7405@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions  ("Daniel Westermann (DWE)" <daniel.westermann@dbi-services.com>)
Responses Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Tree view 
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is
> a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
> I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily
> identify extensions that can be installed as "normal" user.

Adding the trusted flag makes sense for visibility.  There is a bit
more that we could consider though?  For example, what about
"relocatable" and "requires"?
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: raf
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on Windows' state
Next
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions