On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:52:58PM +0200, Alessandro Dentella <sandro.dentella@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > st 23. 9. 2020 v 10:38 odesílatel Alessandro Dentella <
> > sandro.dentella@gmail.com> napsal:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > disclaimer: I've never been a Windows user and I send this email just on
> > > behalf
> > > of a friend that has problems convincing his team to use PostgreSQL.
> > >
> > > I'd like to understand if what the team replies to him is correct or not.
> > >
> > > The final project should work with Python (we know it just works) and with
> > > c#.
> > > The team states that:
> > >
> > > "It does not exist a native driver. You need to use ODBC, that is an old
> > > technology and doesn't give warranties in terms of security, reliability
> > > and
> > > performance."
> > >
> > > Is it any true? is it biased?
> > >
> >
> > https://kb.objectrocket.com/postgresql/how-to-install-psycopg2-in-windows-1460
> >
> > So minimally psycopg2 - native driver for Python exists for Win
>
> Thanks Pavel, but psycopg2 (that I always use is just for Python). T
> hey claim/complain that from c# there's no native solution.
>
> Personally I don't know even if ODBC is really to be considered a second class
> choice. It sounds awkward to me that such a great db has flaws like this (I'm
> NOT stating it *has* flaws)
>
> sandro
Surely, it's a flaw in the C# ecosystem, not a flaw in the database?
(assuming it's true, and assuming there's anything wrong with ODBC). :-)
cheers,
raf
