Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Daniel Westermann (DWE)
Subject Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions
Date
Msg-id ZR0P278MB012202246010B77B6D8620BAD2360@ZR0P278MB0122.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions  (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: PG 13 trusted extensions and pg_available_extensions
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:58 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +0000, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
>> > I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is
>> > a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
>> > I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily
>> > identify extensions that can be installed as "normal" user.
>>
>> Adding the trusted flag makes sense for visibility.  There is a bit
>> more that we could consider though?  For example, what about
>> "relocatable" and "requires"?

>+1, and also the schema (for non relocatable extensions).

+1


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: tutiluren@tutanota.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Can I get some PostgreSQL developer feedback on these five general issues I have with PostgreSQL and its ecosystem?
Next
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Re: Can I get some PostgreSQL developer feedback on these five general issues I have with PostgreSQL and its ecosystem?