Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags
Date
Msg-id CANP8+jK5FrFjzhuAZCoyrtjKej3sM68ODQY9zSep++VDs-RELQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: GetOldestXminExtend for ignoring arbitraryvacuum flags  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 22 March 2017 at 03:42, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 1:53 PM, Seki, Eiji <seki.eiji@jp.fujitsu.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your review, again.
>>
>> I think your proposals are better, so I reflected them.
>
>
> Thanks for the updated patch. Patch looks good to me.
> I marked it as "ready for committer".

Looks good. I'll double check and commit this.

> While reviewing this patch, I found that PGXACT->vacuumFlags
> variable name needs a rename because with the addition of
> PROC_IN_LOGICAL_DECODING flag "vacuumFlags" doesn't
> only use it for vacuum operation. I feel this variable can be renamed
> as just "flags", but anyway that is a different patch.

Good point. Should be an open item.

-- 
Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] increasing the default WAL segment size