Re: The case for version number inflation - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Selena Deckelmann
Subject Re: The case for version number inflation
Date
Msg-id CAN1EF+wqjcEz91udUQBQSgEmPmAoEEM10vr+HTThJNuckD4_mg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to The case for version number inflation  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: The case for version number inflation  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Re: The case for version number inflation  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: The case for version number inflation  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy



On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:

And you're probably aware of the issue with Amazon Linux, where they
don't distinguish between version 9.1 and 9.2 and thus corrupt people's
databases.

This seems like a case to be made for Postgres to respond more elegantly to this situation, possibly by converting blocks on the fly to the newer version of the database for writes and being ok with reading previous versions of blocks, or simply not writing data to the filesystem when the versions don't match.
 
I'll not weigh in on the version number inflation. Seems like a lot of epic bikeshedding.

-selena


--
http://chesnok.com

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: The case for version number inflation