Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nitin Jadhav
Subject Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Date
Msg-id CAMm1aWZfo0pLm0rJjyi=Ucte1eGibumWT2VtQ4qMW-DTxEtaTw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats  ("Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark.cfm@gmail.com>)
Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats  (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
> This doesn't pass the tests, because the regression tests weren't adjusted:
> https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5937624817336320/testrun/build/testrun/regress/regress/regression.diffs

Thanks for sharing this. I have fixed this in the patch attached.


>> IMO, there's no need for 2 separate patches for these changes.
> I will make it a single patch while sharing the next patch.

Clubbed both patches into one.

Thanks & Regards,
Nitin Jadhav

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:08 AM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-12-21 17:14:12 +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
> > Kindly review and share your comments.
>
> This doesn't pass the tests, because the regression tests weren't adjusted:
>
> https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5937624817336320/testrun/build/testrun/regress/regress/regression.diffs
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Handle TEMP_CONFIG for pg_regress style tests in pg_regress.c
Next
From: "wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Rework LogicalOutputPluginWriterUpdateProgress