Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
Date
Msg-id 20230214003801.kt7rhnk7wa45rjxj@awork3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats  (Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats
List pgsql-hackers
On 2022-12-21 17:14:12 +0530, Nitin Jadhav wrote:
> Kindly review and share your comments.

This doesn't pass the tests, because the regression tests weren't adjusted:

https://api.cirrus-ci.com/v1/artifact/task/5937624817336320/testrun/build/testrun/regress/regress/regression.diffs



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Buffer usage detailed by RelKind in EXPLAIN ANALYZE BUFFERS
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding "large" to PG_TEST_EXTRA