On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 at 21:31, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:23 PM Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On 17.03.22 14:12, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: >> > v19-0001 changes the format string for XIDs from %u to XID_FMT. This >> > refactoring allows us to switch to UINT64_FORMAT by changing one >> > #define in the future patches. >> > >> > Kyotaro suggested using `errmsg("blah blah %lld ..", (long long) >> > xid)` instead in order to simplify localization of the error messages. >> > Personally I don't have a strong opinion here. Either approach will >> > work and will affect the error messages eventually. Please let us know >> > what you think. >> >> This is not a question of simplification. Translatable messages with >> embedded macros won't work. This patch isn't going to be acceptable. > > I've suspected this, but wasn't sure. Thank you for clarification.
Hi, hackers!
The need to support localization is very much understood by us. We'll deliver a patchset soon with localization based on %lld/%llu format and explicit casts to unsigned/signed long long.
Alexander Alexeev could you wait a little bit and give us time to deliver v20 patch which will address localization (I propose concurrent work should stop until that to avoid conflicts)