Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From vignesh C
Subject Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority
Date
Msg-id CALDaNm38F070Gs3wYMBBg98iSVUAdsW7YAKfHQ==FoippvbWAA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority  (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 7:07 AM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:09 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Modified.
> > These comments are handled in v22 patch posted in my earlier mail.
> >
>
> Thanks, just one minor thing I missed in doc/src/sgml/libpq.sgml.
>
> +        The support of read-write transactions is determined by the
> value of the
> +        <varname>default_transaction_read_only</varname> and
> +        <varname>in_hot_standby</varname> configuration parameters, that is
> +        reported by the server (if supported) upon successful connection.  If
>
>
> should be:
>
> +        The support of read-write transactions is determined by the
> values of the
> +        <varname>default_transaction_read_only</varname> and
> +        <varname>in_hot_standby</varname> configuration parameters, that are
> +        reported by the server (if supported) upon successful connection.  If
>
>
> (i.e. "value" -> "values" and "is" -> "are")

Thanks for the comments, this is handled in the v23 patch attached.
Thoughts?

Regards,
Vignesh

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zhihong Yu
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel INSERT (INTO ... SELECT ...)
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?