Re: \timing interval - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: \timing interval
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRChHS0hnCw-Yq1+oL93Eq+JgEn4CLM0SBQ58wruEriOpQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: \timing interval  (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


2016-09-08 13:10 GMT+02:00 Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>:

On 4 Sep. 2016 3:36 am, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>

> After further thought I concluded that not providing any labeling of
> days is a bad idea. 

Yeah. I think labeling days is definitely good. I'm glad you changed that.

Personally I'd like to trim milliseconds when dealing with minute+ long runs and seconds from hour+ runs too, since it's all there in the ms output and the units output is for human readability. I see the value of retaining full precision too, though, and don't feel strongly about it.


It should be hard to read without units. I know so now it is maybe late, but the current output is not too readable for me. I miss units - 10s, 1m20.5s, 1h 30m 5s

Regards

Pavel


 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST penalty functions [PoC]
Next
From: Andrew Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: GiST penalty functions [PoC]