Re: \timing interval - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Craig Ringer
Subject Re: \timing interval
Date
Msg-id CAMsr+YEA3Vk5zZZOTf7WmwDJnmrV4OcFV185jGw9=E=bHgQL8Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: \timing interval  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: \timing interval
List pgsql-hackers
<p dir="ltr"><p dir="ltr">On 4 Sep. 2016 3:36 am, "Tom Lane" <<a
href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>>wrote:<br /> ><p dir="ltr">> After further thought I
concludedthat not providing any labeling of<br /> > days is a bad idea. <p dir="ltr">Yeah. I think labeling days is
definitelygood. I'm glad you changed that.<p dir="ltr">Personally I'd like to trim milliseconds when dealing with
minute+long runs and seconds from hour+ runs too, since it's all there in the ms output and the units output is for
humanreadability. I see the value of retaining full precision too, though, and don't feel strongly about it. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: High-CPU consumption on information_schema (only) query
Next
From: Victor Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.