Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRB7gyMUxcXfHJkHqZgDzG95NicNQMngqo+T-7+4Fm9zoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation
List pgsql-hackers
Hi

I repeated tests. I wrote a set of simple functions. It is a synthetical test, but I think it can identify potential problems well.

I calculated the average of 3 cycles and I checked the performance of each function. I didn't find any problem. The total execution time is well too. Patched code is about 11% faster than master (14sec x 15.8sec). So there is new important functionality with nice performance benefits.

make check-world passed

Regards

Pavel



Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Zhihong Yu
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pglz compression performance, take two