Re: pglz compression performance, take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pglz compression performance, take two
Date
Msg-id 1292319.1609006061@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pglz compression performance, take two  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 12/26/20 8:06 AM, Andrey Borodin wrote:
>> I'm still in doubt should I register this patch on CF or not. I'm willing to work on this, but it's not clear will
ithit PGv14. And I hope for PGv15 we will have lz4 or something better for WAL compression. 

> I'd suggest registering it, otherwise people are much less likely to
> give you feedback. I don't see why it couldn't land in PG14.

Even if lz4 or something else shows up, the existing code will remain
important for TOAST purposes.  It would be years before we lose interest
in it.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking plpgsql's assignment implementation
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Generic type subscripting