Re: pglz compression performance, take two - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: pglz compression performance, take two
Date
Msg-id 18a39267-341b-0424-2b05-9a0f54e55a9d@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pglz compression performance, take two  (Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: pglz compression performance, take two
List pgsql-hackers

On 12/26/20 8:06 AM, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> 
> 
>> 12 дек. 2020 г., в 22:47, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> написал(а):
>>
>>
> 
> I've cleaned up comments, checked that memory alignment stuff actually make sense for 32-bit ARM (according to
Godbolt)and did some more code cleanup. PFA v2 patch.
 
> 
> I'm still in doubt should I register this patch on CF or not. I'm willing to work on this, but it's not clear will it
hitPGv14. And I hope for PGv15 we will have lz4 or something better for WAL compression.
 
> 

I'd suggest registering it, otherwise people are much less likely to 
give you feedback. I don't see why it couldn't land in PG14.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add key management system
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Added missing copy related data structures to typedefs.list