Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From John Naylor
Subject Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba
Date
Msg-id CAFBsxsFogMaP8hc7yPJYs_20JwK562ay4aOwE9rZ=33dipPoKQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
List pgsql-hackers


On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:07 AM Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>
> > In the refactoring patch, there is a lingering comment reference to roles_has_privs_of(). Aside from that, it looks good to me. A possible thing to consider is an assert that is_admin is not null where we expect that.
>
> Thanks.  The next version will contain the comment fix and
> "Assert(OidIsValid(admin_of) == PointerIsValid(is_admin));".
>
> > The database owner role patch looks good as well.
>
> Do you plan to put the CF entry into Ready for Committer, or should the
> patches wait for another review?

I've marked it Ready for Committer.

--
John Naylor
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?