Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
Date
Msg-id 610eafb4-c1ee-5221-c874-9be766459a98@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/25/21 9:41 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 1/22/21 5:19 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 22/10/2020 14:48, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2017 13:37, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>>> I planned to do some benchmarking on this patch, but apparently the
>>>> patch no longer applies. Rebase please?
>>>
>>> Here's a rebase of this. Sorry to keep you waiting :-).
> 
> I am amused that the wait here was 3+ years!
> 
>> Here's an updated version that fixes one bug:
> 
> We're near the end of the CF and this has not really seen any review 
> after a long hiatus. I'll move this to the next CF on April 30 unless I 
> hear objections.

Oops, I meant March 30.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Polyphase merge is obsolete
Next
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba