Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Date
Msg-id 9546015d-4758-dfd8-04cb-d85c56ae4dc9@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  ("Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>)
Responses Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/22/21 6:46 PM, Finnerty, Jim wrote:
> First 3 patches derived from the original 64-bit xid patch set by Alexander Korotkov

The patches no longer apply 
(http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2960.log), so marked Waiting on Author.

I also removed the PG14 target since this is a fresh patch set after a 
long hiatus with no new review.

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: Tying an object's ownership to datdba
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data