Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKGJeQKKN4x-tnfjTik1v1C2HCh9pDr5_R6HJWMgt_-6nJg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 2:57 AM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 1/22/21 6:46 PM, Finnerty, Jim wrote:
> > First 3 patches derived from the original 64-bit xid patch set by Alexander Korotkov
>
> The patches no longer apply
> (http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_32_2960.log), so marked Waiting on Author.
>
> I also removed the PG14 target since this is a fresh patch set after a
> long hiatus with no new review.

Hi Jim,

I just wanted to say that I'm definitely interested in progress in
this area, and I'm sure many others are too.  Let's talk again about
incremental steps in the PG15 cycle.  The reason for lack of responses
on this thread is most likely due to being at the business end of the
PG14 cycle.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical Replication - improve error message while adding tables to the publication in check_publication_add_relation
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: increase size of pg_commit_ts buffers