Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date
Msg-id 944e56dd-b200-01cd-8135-77e505cd8137@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1/25/21 3:55 AM, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 08:19 +0000, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
>>> I think you should pst another patch where the second, now superfluous, error
>>> message is removed.
>>
>> Updated. This patch showed no failure during regression tests
>> and has been aligned by pgindent.
> 
> Looks good to me.
> I'll set it to "ready for committer" again.

Fujii, does the new patch in [1] address your concerns?

Regards,
-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net

[1] 
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/OSBPR01MB48887EFFCA39FA9B1DBAFB0FEDBD0%40OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: Challenges preventing us moving to 64 bit transaction id (XID)?
Next
From: torikoshia
Date:
Subject: Re: Get memory contexts of an arbitrary backend process