Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date
Msg-id 528512f699cc4acc24d8c8195e53ed3e4e699159.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 08:19 +0000, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> > I think you should pst another patch where the second, now superfluous, error
> > message is removed.
>
> Updated. This patch showed no failure during regression tests
> and has been aligned by pgindent.

Looks good to me.
I'll set it to "ready for committer" again.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Neil Chen
Date:
Subject: Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)