Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Neil Chen
Subject Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens
Date
Msg-id 161156428867.8805.10514003990986531276.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Phrase search vs. multi-lexeme tokens  (Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
Implements feature:       tested, passed
Spec compliant:           not tested
Documentation:            not tested

Greetings,

Although I am not an expert in this field, I carefully read the full-text search section in the document. I think the
changeis surprising, but yes, it is correct.
 
I found that your patch didn't modify the regress/excepted/tsearch.out. So I updated it and carried out the regression
test.It passed. Also, I manually executed some test cases, all of which were OK. 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "iwata.aya@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: libpq debug log
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data