Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Geoff Winkless
Subject Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
Date
Msg-id CAEzk6ffvUREfF4aZbMnrd=rtjOgk1RYdkUAyV5xZPB5XEDjnNw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018 at 13:41, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 06:48 AM, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> > +    | AS 'obj_file', 'link_symbol' [UNBOUNDED]
> > (I know UNBOUNDED isn't quite the word - BINDLATE would be better -
> > but I figured I should try to use an existing reserved keyword...)
>
> UNBOUNDED would be terrible. It does not mean the same thing as UNBOUND.

Indeed. I agree.

> Perhaps something like NO CHECK would meet the case, i.e. we're not
> checking the link at function creation time.

I did wonder about "NO CHECK" but wasn't sure if having two words
would make the parser change more complex.

Geoff


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.inadded in v11 development
Next
From: Christian Ullrich
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_config.h.win32 missing a set of flags from pg_config.h.inadded in v11 development