> On Jun 3, 2018, at 4:29 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 02, 2018 at 05:20:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
>>> On 02/06/18 17:09, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> More concerning is that RHEL6 is on 1.0.1e:
>>
>>> I was only thinking of requiring 1.0.2 on Windows.
>>
>> Ah. Personally, I don't care about that case, but maybe somebody
>> else wants to speak for it?
>
> That's what I meant as well. Cutting the minimal OpenSSL version on
> Linux would not come I think without complains so the requirements are
> way higher. I know of companies compiling and running benchmarks of
> PostgreSQL on past RHEL and SUSE versions, linking to what's locally
> available for simplicity.
>
> A script which reports the version of OpenSSL should be simple enough
> for MSVC. And I am ready to bet that at least hamerkop is not using
> OpenSSL 1.0.2, so a simple switch would most likely cause the buildfarm
> to go red. I am attaching in CC the maintainers of the Windows animals
> so as they can comment.
Wanted to check in and see if any of the Windows maintainers had thoughts
on this issue so we can continue to move it forward.
Thanks!
Jonathan
